How Our Bloomington Texting and Driving Lawyers Build Your Case

NHTSA reports that distracted driving kills more than 3,000 people on U.S. roads each year, and texting at highway speed takes a driver’s eyes off the road long enough to cover the length of a football field.

Carriers know that admitting their insured was on the phone shifts the comparative fault math in your favor. So the standard playbook is to demand proof of phone activity at the second of impact and to fight every causation inference. Christie Bell & Marshall builds that proof from data the at-fault driver cannot reach to alter:

  • Subpoena the at-fault driver’s cell carrier records. AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and other carriers retain call, text, and data activity timestamped to the second, and a properly framed civil subpoena produces them inside 30 days when filed early.
  • Pull the vehicle’s infotainment system log. Modern infotainment units record Bluetooth pairing, navigation activity, app launches, and music or podcast playback timestamps, all of which corroborate phone-in-hand use even when carrier records lag.
  • Download the event data recorder from both vehicles. EDR data captures pre-impact speed, throttle, brake, and steering inputs in the five seconds before contact, and a driver who never lifted off the accelerator and never touched the brake is the classic distracted-driving signature.
  • Canvass surveillance and dashcam coverage along the corridor. Storefront cameras, commercial vehicle dashcams from semis traveling alongside, and rideshare driver footage often capture the at-fault driver looking down at the lap or holding a phone to the steering wheel.
  • Document the officer’s roadside observations. Bloomington PD and Monroe County Sheriff reports often note phone-in-hand admissions, an unlocked phone on the passenger seat, or open messaging apps on the device, and the Indiana hands-free statute under IC 9-21-8-59 supports a citation that feeds the civil case.
  • Match the social media and account activity to the timeline. Snapchat, Instagram, and similar platforms timestamp posts and stories, and a driver who posted seconds before the crash has supplied the strongest possible proof in their own words.

Our case results reflect how Indiana juries respond when the distraction is documented to the second rather than argued. Reach out to a Bloomington texting and driving lawyer at Christie Bell & Marshall for a free review, and we will start the subpoena work before the carrier purges the records.

Speak with a personal injury lawyer today. Call: 317-488-5500

Indiana Law on Texting and Distracted Driving

Indiana tightened its hands-free statute in 2020 to bar any holding of a device while driving, giving plaintiffs a clean negligence-per-se anchor the prior typing-only law did not.

  • Hands-free statute: IC 9-21-8-59 bars holding or using a telecommunications device while operating a moving motor vehicle, with narrow exceptions for emergency calls and hands-free operation.
  • Negligence per se: A phone-in-hand admission, dashcam footage, or timestamped carrier records can establish the statutory breach.
  • Speed duty still applies: IC 9-21-5-1 requires a speed reasonable and prudent under the conditions, even if the driver stayed under the posted limit.
  • Comparative fault: IC 34-51-2 allows recovery when you are 50 percent or less at fault, with your share reducing the recovery. Timestamped phone activity helps counter arguments that you should have avoided the crash.
  • Deadline to file: IC 34-11-2-4 generally gives you two years from the crash, but phone-data retention can be far shorter, so preservation and subpoenas need to move fast.

Pairing the statutory violation with timestamped phone activity, EDR data, and a reasonable-and-prudent-speed theory is often what closes the causation gap carriers try to exploit.

Complete a Free Case Evaluation form now

Common Injuries in Bloomington Texting and Driving Crashes

A driver who never brakes transfers the full energy of the impact into the struck vehicle, which is why even low-speed rear-end crashes from a phone-distracted driver often produce serious injuries the carrier tries to dismiss as minor. The injuries we most often work to document on these files:

  • Traumatic brain injury from acceleration-deceleration forces even at lower posted speeds, particularly when there was no pre-impact braking.
  • Whiplash and cervical disc herniation that often surface days after a rear-end and require imaging the ER did not order.
  • Lumbar disc injuries and facet joint trauma that produce radiating pain and limit return-to-work.
  • Shoulder, wrist, and forearm fractures from bracing against the steering wheel or center console.
  • Knee and ankle injuries from footwell intrusion in higher-energy distracted crashes.
  • Severe pedestrian and cyclist trauma when a distracted driver fails to see a crossing victim in a campus or downtown crosswalk.
  • Burns and inhalation injury when a high-energy distracted-driving impact ignites a fuel-tank fire.

A texting-crash carrier almost always attacks soft-tissue and disc claims as unrelated to the impact. Our team treats with IU Health Bloomington providers, schedules neurology and orthopedic imaging quickly after the crash, and retains causation experts whenever the chart needs more than the primary doctor’s notes to make the case.

Click to contact us today

What Compensation Can You Recover After a Bloomington Texting Crash

Indiana law lets you pursue the full set of damages categories, and distracted-driving injuries often make those claims larger than the policy minimums.

Economic Damages

Economic damages cover medical bills, future treatment, rehab, medication, and any out-of-pocket costs tied to the crash. They also include lost wages and reduced earning capacity, plus property damage and transportation needs while you cannot drive.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages include pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, disfigurement, and loss of consortium. In wrongful death cases, damages can include medical and funeral expenses and the financial and household losses to surviving family.

Punitive Damages

In rare cases involving extreme misconduct, punitive damages may be available under IC 34-51-3, capped at the greater of $50,000 or three times compensatory damages.

To maximize value, the key is documenting future care and lost capacity early, before the insurer reduces the claim to a short-term billing snapshot.

Do You Have a Bloomington Texting and Driving Claim?

Tina M. Bell is a Christie Bell & Marshall partner who spent years on the defense side representing doctors, hospitals, and insurance carriers before she moved to the injured person’s side. Here is how that background shapes a texting case.

Having sat in the defense chair, I know exactly how the carrier is going to attack a phone case, and it is almost never about whether the driver was on the phone. It is about causation. They will say the herniated disc was already there, that the concussion was minor, that the imaging came too long after the crash to count.

So I build the file to take that argument away. I subpoena the carrier phone records and the infotainment log early to lock in what the driver was doing, and at the same time I make sure the medical workup happens fast and the imaging gets ordered before anyone can call the gap suspicious. What you can do on your end is simple but it matters: keep every appointment, do not tough it out in silence, and let us handle the phone evidence before it ages out.

Contact a Bloomington Texting and Driving Accident Attorney at Christie Bell & Marshall

The free consultation with our Bloomington team breaks down what timestamped proof is realistically still available, which insurance layers apply to your specific crash, and what a fully built file is worth on a Monroe County jury verdict. No fee unless we win, and the conversation is confidential, carries no obligation, and gives you a clear picture of what to expect. Schedule your free consultation with Christie Bell & Marshall today.

FAQs About Bloomington Texting and Driving Accidents

How do you prove a driver was texting at the moment of the crash in Indiana?

Several data streams settle it: carrier subpoenas timestamp texts and data, infotainment logs show app and navigation use, and EDR data shows the driver never braked. Nearby video often catches phone-in-hand, so we can prove the case without a driver admission.

Is texting while driving illegal in Indiana?

Yes. Indiana’s hands-free statute at IC 9-21-8-59 bars holding or using a device while driving, with narrow exceptions for emergency and hands-free use. A violation supports negligence per se in the civil case.

Can I recover if the driver who hit me used Snapchat or another social media app rather than texting?

Yes. The hands-free statute covers any holding or use of a device, not just texting. Social media is often easier to prove because Snapchat, Instagram, and TikTok publicly timestamp posts, so a driver who posted seconds before the crash supplies the strongest evidence.

What if I had been texting myself but the other driver still caused the crash?

You can still recover under modified comparative fault at IC 34-51-2 if you were 50 percent or less at fault. Your share reduces but does not bar the claim, so we document both sides of the timeline with evidence.

How long do I have to file a texting and driving claim in Indiana?

IC 34-11-2-4 gives you two years from the crash, but carriers purge text content in as little as 90 days, so the subpoena work has to happen fast, long before the filing deadline.